Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
A compact solution for estimation of physiological parameters from ultrafast prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | He, Dianning Fan, Xiaobing Chatterjee, Aritrick Wang, Shiyang Medved, Milica Pineda, Federico D. Yousuf, Ambereen Antic, Tatjana Oto, Aytekin Karczmar, Gregory S. |
| Copyright Year | 2019 |
| Description | Journal: Physics in Medicine & Biology The Tofts pharmacokinetic model requires multiple calculations for analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI. In addition, the Tofts model may not be appropriate for the prostate. This can result in error propagation that reduces the accuracy of pharmacokinetic measurements. In this study, we present a compact solution allowing estimation of physiological parameters $K^{trans}$ and $v_{e}$ from ultrafast DCE acquisitions, without fitting DCE-MRI data to the standard Tofts pharmacokinetic model. Since the standard Tofts model can be simplified to the Patlak model at early times when contrast efflux from the extravascular extracellular space back to plasma is negligible, $K^{trans}$ can be solved explicitly for a specific time. Further, $v_{e}$ can be estimated directly from the late steady-state signal using the derivative form of Tofts model. Ultrafast DCE-MRI data were acquired from 18 prostate cancer patients on a Philips Achieva 3T-TX scanner. Regions-of-interest (ROIs) for prostate cancer, normal tissue, gluteal muscle, and iliac artery were manually traced. The contrast media concentration as function of time was calculated over each ROI using gradient echo signal equation with pre-contrast tissue T1 values, and using the 'reference tissue' model with a linear approximation. There was strong correlation (r = 0.88 to 0.91, p < 0.0001) between $K^{trans}$ extracted from the Tofts model and $K^{trans}$ estimated from the compact solution for prostate cancer and normal tissue. Additionally, there was moderate correlation (r = 0.65 to 0.73, p < 0.0001) between extracted vs. estimated $v_{e}$. Bland–Altman analysis showed moderate to good agreement between physiological parameters extracted from the Tofts model and those estimated from the compact solution with absolute bias less than 0.20 $min^{-1}$ and 0.10 for $K^{trans}$ and $v_{e}$, respectively. The compact solution may decrease systematic errors and error propagation, and could increase the efficiency of clinical workflow. The compact solution requires high temporal resolution DCE-MRI due to the need to adequately sample the early phase of contrast media uptake. |
| Related Links | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/ab2b62/pdf |
| ISSN | 00319155 |
| e-ISSN | 13616560 |
| DOI | 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2b62 |
| Journal | Physics in Medicine & Biology |
| Issue Number | 15 |
| Volume Number | 64 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | IOP Publishing |
| Publisher Date | 2019-06-20 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Journal: Physics in Medicine & Biology Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging Tofts Model Error Propagation |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging Radiological and Ultrasound Technology |
