Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Acceptance of health technology assessment submissions with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above the cost-effectiveness threshold
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Griffiths, Elizabeth Hendrich, Janek Walsh, Sean Stoddart, Samuel |
| Copyright Year | 2015 |
| Description | Journal: ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research |
| Abstract | Acceptance of health technology assessment submissions with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above the cost-effectiveness threshold Elizabeth A Griffiths, Janek K Hendrich, Samuel DR Stoddart, Sean CM Walsh HERON™ Commercialization, PAREXEL International, London, UK Objectives: In health technology assessment (HTA) agencies where cost-effectiveness plays a role in decision-making, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold is often used to inform reimbursement decisions. The acceptance of submissions with ICERs higher than the threshold was assessed across different agencies and across indications, in order to inform future reimbursement submissions. Methods: All HTA appraisals from May 2000 to May 2014 from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) were assessed. Multiple technology appraisals, resubmissions, vaccination programs, and requests for advice were excluded. Submissions not reporting an ICER, or for which an ICER could not be determined were also excluded. The remaining appraisals were reviewed, and the submitted ICER, recommendation, and reasoning behind the recommendation were extracted. Results: NICE recommended the highest proportion of submissions with ICERs higher than the threshold (34% accepted without restrictions; 20% with restrictions), followed by PBAC (16% accepted without restrictions; 4% with restrictions), SMC (11% accepted without restrictions; 14% accepted with restrictions), and CADTH (0% accepted without restrictions; 26% with restrictions). Overall, the majority of higher-than-threshold ICER submissions were classified into the "malignant disease and immunosuppression" therapeutic category; however, there was no notable variation in acceptance rates by disease area. Reasons for accepting submissions reporting ICERs above the threshold included high clinical benefit over the standard of care, and addressing an unmet therapeutic need. Conclusion: Acceptance of submissions with higher-than-threshold ICERs varied by HTA agency and was not significantly influenced by disease category. Such submissions must be accompanied by robust, concrete, and transparent evidence in order to achieve patient access. Keywords: decision-making, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, health technology assessment, QALY, cost-effectiveness |
| Related Links | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564087/pdf https://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=26852 |
| Ending Page | 476 |
| Page Count | 14 |
| Starting Page | 463 |
| ISSN | 11786981 |
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s87462 |
| Journal | ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research |
| Volume Number | ume 7 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited |
| Publisher Date | 2015-08-01 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Journal: ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Medical Informatics Cost-effectiveness Decision-making Health Technology Assessment Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio |
| Content Type | Text |
| Subject | Economics, Econometrics and Finance Health Policy |
