Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) and LRP in patients with prostate cancer based on risk groups
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Amornratananont, Napat Sirisopana, Kun Worawichawong, Suchin Chalermsanyakorn, Panas Sangkum, Premsant Pacharatakul, Suthep Leenanupunth, Charoen Kongchareonsombat, Wisoot |
| Copyright Year | 2020 |
| Description | Journal: Arab Journal of Urology Objective: To compare the perioperative and pathological outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) and LRP based on the patient's risk. Patients and methods: The medical records of 588 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RP, using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques (240 LRP and 348 RALRP) by a single surgeon during January 2008 to June 2018 at the Ramathibodi Hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. The patient's risk was classified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline, 2018. The demographic, perioperative, and pathological data of patients were collected. The differences in perioperative and pathological outcomes between LRP and RALRP in each risk classification were assessed using chi-square, Fisher's exact tests and logistic regression, as appropriate. Results: In terms of positive margins, RALRP had significant advantages in high-risk patients when compared to LRP (adjusted odds ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.84), while there were no differences in the low- and intermediate-risk patients. Overall, the patients who underwent RALRP had significant advantages over those who underwent LRP in terms of operative time, estimate blood loss, and blood transfusion rate. While, adjacent organ injury rate and length of hospital stay were similar for both techniques in all subgroup analyses. Conclusion: MIS techniques appear to be safe, especially RALRP, which has significantly better perioperative outcomes in all subgroups of patient risk classification, and in the high-risk patient group it seems to have better pathological outcomes when compared to LRP. Abbreviations: EBL: estimated blood loss; LOS: length of hospital stay; PSM: positive surgical margin; (L)(O)(RAL)RP: (laparoscopic) (open) (robot-assisted laparoscopic) radical prostatectomy; MIS: minimally invasive surgery |
| Related Links | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1750865?needAccess=true https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473109/pdf |
| Ending Page | 193 |
| Page Count | 7 |
| Starting Page | 187 |
| e-ISSN | 2090598X |
| DOI | 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1750865 |
| Journal | Arab Journal of Urology |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| Volume Number | 18 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited |
| Publisher Date | 2020-07-02 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Journal: Arab Journal of Urology Integrative and Complementary Medicine Prostate Cancer Radical Prostatectomy Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Risk Stratification Perioperative Outcomes |
| Content Type | Text |
