Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
The Dispute between the Constitutional Tribunal and the Supreme Court over Interpretative Verdicts in the Republic of Poland
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Dąbrowski, Marcin |
| Copyright Year | 2017 |
| Description | Summary The article is focused on a serious dispute between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Tribunal over interpretative verdicts in the Republic of Poland. This kind of decisions are issued by the Tribunal. Interpretative verdicts contain explanation (interpretation) of a statutory provision, which constitutionality is controlled by the Tribunal. The main problem is, if this kind of decisions bind other courts. Judges of the Tribunal Court claim that courts, including the Supreme Court, are suppose to obey interpretative verdicts. The judges of Supreme Court maintain that this kind of decisions only indicates one of possible interpretation of a statutory provision and courts don’t have to follow it. In the article the author describes this type of verdicts, their history and explains the essence of the dispute. |
| Related Links | https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/iclr/17/1/article-p211.pdf http://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/iclr.2017.17.issue-1/iclr-2018-0009/iclr-2018-0009.xml |
| Ending Page | 222 |
| Page Count | 12 |
| Starting Page | 211 |
| e-ISSN | 24646601 |
| DOI | 10.2478/iclr-2018-0009 |
| Journal | International and Comparative Law Review |
| Issue Number | 1 |
| Volume Number | 17 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| Publisher Date | 2017-06-01 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | International and Comparative Law Review History Poland Supreme Court Dispute Constitutional Tribunal Verdicts Statutory Provision Court Claim Journal: International and Comparative Law Review, Vol- 17 |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
