Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Lewinski, Marcin |
| Copyright Year | 2014 |
| Description | Dialectical fallacies are typically defined as breaches of the rules of a regulated discussion between two participants (di-logue). What if discussions become more complex and involve multiple parties with distinct positions to argue for (poly-logues)? Are there distinct argumentation norms of polylogues? If so, can their violations be conceptualized as polylogical fallacies? I will argue for such an approach and analyze two candidates for argumentative breaches of multi-party rationality: false dilemma and collateral straw man. |
| Related Links | https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/slgr/36/1/article-p193.pdf http://www.degruyter.com/dg/viewarticle.fullcontentlink:pdfeventlink/$002fj$002fslgr.2014.36.issue-1$002fslgr-2014-0010$002fslgr-2014-0010.pdf?t:ac=j$002fslgr.2014.36.issue-1$002fslgr-2014-0010$002fslgr-2014-0010.xml |
| Ending Page | 218 |
| Page Count | 26 |
| Starting Page | 193 |
| ISSN | 0860150X |
| DOI | 10.2478/slgr-2014-0010 |
| Journal | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
| Issue Number | 1 |
| Volume Number | 36 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
| Publisher Date | 2014-03-01 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Communication Argumentation Dialectic Journal: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol- 36 |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Philosophy |
