Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Comparison of an interactive 24-h recall and weighed food record for measuring energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods among 9–10-month-old Malawian infants consuming lipid-based nutrient supplements
| Content Provider | Scilit |
|---|---|
| Author | Hemsworth, Jaimie Arimond, Mary Kumwenda, Chiza Rehman, Andrea M. Maleta, Kenneth Ashorn, Ulla Keogh, Ruth Ferguson, Elaine L. |
| Copyright Year | 2018 |
| Abstract | Fortifying complementary foods with lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) may improve energy and nutrient intakes of infants at risk for undernutrition. We aimed to determine the relative validity of an interactive 24-h recall (i-24-HR) for assessing the impact of an LNS intervention on dietary intakes of energy and nutrients among rural Malawian 9–10-month-old infants (n 132) participating in the International Lipid‐Based Nutrient Supplements Dose (iLiNS-DOSE) trial. Dietary data were collected for the same day via i-24-HR and weighed food records. Inter-method agreements were estimated overall and by intervention group, using Bland–Altman plots and paired t tests; measurement error models (differential error); and percentage of food omissions and intrusions were estimated. Overall, inter-method differences in mean intakes of energy and most nutrients were not significant. When stratified by group, recalled energy intakes were under-estimated (−368 kJ; P=0·01) in the control but not in the intervention group (−42 kJ; P=0·6). This differential reporting error was related to an over-estimation of recalled LNS (8·1 v. 4·5 g; P<0·001) in the intervention group, compensating for an under-estimation of energy and nutrient intakes from complementary foods. Sources of measurement error in the i-24-HR were under-estimations of starchy staples, meat/fish/eggs and legumes/nuts/seeds (overall percentage agreement between 38 and 89 %; P<0·028); and over-estimations of added sugar, soups/broths and LNS (overall percentage agreement between 138 and 149 %; P30 % eating occasions) omissions were milk/fish/eggs, starchy roots/vegetables and sweetened snacks. Common intrusions were milk/yogurt. Starchy staples and LNS were recalled when consumed (>85 %) (i.e. matched). These results emphasise the importance of considering differential error when interpreting dietary results in LNS trials. |
| Related Links | https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/12DBC3473868B30FABD1F8CF1AEED0B1/S0007114518002374a.pdf/div-class-title-comparison-of-an-interactive-24-h-recall-and-weighed-food-record-for-measuring-energy-and-nutrient-intakes-from-complementary-foods-among-9-10-month-old-malawian-infants-consuming-lipid-based-nutrient-supplements-div.pdf |
| Ending Page | 1271 |
| Page Count | 10 |
| Starting Page | 1262 |
| ISSN | 00071145 |
| e-ISSN | 14752662 |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007114518002374 |
| Journal | British Journal Of Nutrition |
| Issue Number | 11 |
| Volume Number | 120 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
| Publisher Date | 2018-10-23 |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | British Journal Of Nutrition Nutrition and Dietetics based Nutrient Supplements Weighed Records h Recall Dietary Assessment International Lipid–based Nutrient Supplements Dose Lipid–based Nutrient Supplements Limits of Agreement Weighed Food Records |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Nutrition and Dietetics Medicine |
