NDLI: Performance comparison of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on the control channel and a centralized MAC on a service channel

Content Provider	IEEE Xplore Digital Library
Author	Bohm, A. Jonsson, M. Uhlemann, E.
Copyright Year	2013
Description	Author affiliation: CERES (Centre for Res. on Embedded Syst.), Halmstad Univ., Halmstad, Sweden (Bohm, A.; Jonsson, M.; Uhlemann, E.)
Abstract	Recent advances in cooperative driving hold the potential to significantly improve safety, comfort and efficiency on our roads. An application of particular interest is platooning of trucks, where it has been shown that keeping a minimum inter-vehicle distance results in considerably reduced fuel consumption. This, however, puts high requirements on timeliness and reliability of the underlying exchange of control messages between platoon members. The European profile of IEEE 802.11p, recently adopted by ETSI, defines two message types to this end, periodic beacons for basic cooperative awareness (CAM) and event-triggered decentralized environmental notification messages (DENM), both of which will use one common control channel. IEEE 802.11p employs a random medium access protocol, which may experience excessive delays during high network loads. To mitigate these effects, ETSI standardizes a decentralized congestion control algorithm to, e.g., lower the CAM update frequency during high loads. However, this may prevent proper functionality of a platooning application. In this paper we propose a solution that instead uses a dedicated service channel for platooning applications and compare its performance to standard-compliant IEEE 802.11p inter-platoon communication on the control channel. Service channels typically have less strict requirements on send rates, data traffic types and medium access methods. Our service channel solution combines a random access phase for DENM with a centralized, scheduled access phase for CAM. Using a service channel enables us to guarantee timely channel access for all CAM packets before a specified deadline while still being able to provide a reasonable DENM dissemination delay.
Sponsorship	IEEE Comput. Soc.
Starting Page	545
Ending Page	552
File Size	758885
Page Count	8
File Format	PDF
ISBN	9781479904280
ISSN	21604886
DOI	10.1109/WiMOB.2013.6673411
Language	English
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Publisher Date	2013-10-07
Publisher Place	France
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Rights Holder	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Performance evaluation of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on a control channel vs. a centralized real-time MAC on a service channel

Performance comparison of a platooning application using the ieee 802.11p mac on the control channel and a centralized mac on a service channel.

Performance comparison of IEEE 1609.4/802.11p and 802.11e with EDCA implementation in MAC sublayer

Performance Analysis of Distributed Broadcasting in IEEE 802.11p MAC Protocol

Co-existing periodic beaconing and hazard warnings in IEEE 802.11p-based platooning applications

Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p Control Channel

Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p MAC protocol in VANETs safety applications

Coordinated scheduling scheme for IEEE 802.11p wireless vehicular networks using centralized scheduling of IEEE 802.16e wireless metropolitan area networks

Field Measurements of IEEE 802.11p Communication in NLOS Environments for a Platooning Application

Performance comparison of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on the control channel and a centralized MAC on a service channel

Similar Documents

Performance evaluation of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on a control channel vs. a centralized real-time MAC on a service channel

Performance comparison of a platooning application using the ieee 802.11p mac on the control channel and a centralized mac on a service channel.

Performance comparison of IEEE 1609.4/802.11p and 802.11e with EDCA implementation in MAC sublayer

Performance Analysis of Distributed Broadcasting in IEEE 802.11p MAC Protocol

Co-existing periodic beaconing and hazard warnings in IEEE 802.11p-based platooning applications

Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p Control Channel

Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p MAC protocol in VANETs safety applications

Coordinated scheduling scheme for IEEE 802.11p wireless vehicular networks using centralized scheduling of IEEE 802.16e wireless metropolitan area networks

Field Measurements of IEEE 802.11p Communication in NLOS Environments for a Platooning Application

Performance comparison of a platooning application using the IEEE 802.11p MAC on the control channel and a centralized MAC on a service channel