Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Can We Use Eplets (or Molecular) Mismatch Load Analysis to Improve Organ Allocation? The Hope and the Hype.
| Content Provider | Europe PMC |
|---|---|
| Author | Tambur, Anat R. Das, Rajdeep |
| Copyright Year | 2022 |
| Abstract | In recent years, there have been calls for implementation of “epitope matching” in deceased-donor organ allocation policies (later changed to “eplet matching”). Emerging data indeed support the use of molecular mismatch load analysis in specific patient groups, with the objective of posttransplant stratification into different treatment arms. For this purpose, the expectation is to statistically categorize patients as low- or high-immune-risk. Importantly, these patients will continue to be monitored‚ and their risk category, as well as their management, can be adjusted according to on-going findings. However, when discussing deceased donor organ allocation and matching algorithms, where the decision is not modifiable and has lasting impact on outcomes, the situation is fundamentally different. The goal of changing allocation schemes is to achieve the best possible HLA compatibility between donor and recipient. Immunologically speaking, this is a very different objective. For this purpose, the specific interplay of immunogenicity between the donor and any potential recipient must be understood. In seeking compatibility, the aim is not to redefine matching but to identify those mismatches that are “permissible” or‚ in other words, less immunogenic. In our eagerness to improve transplant outcome, unfortunately, we have conflated the hype with the hope. Terminology is used improperly, and new terms are created in the process with no sufficient support. Here, we call for a cautious evaluation of baseline assumptions and a critical review of the evidence to minimize unintended consequences. |
| Related Links | https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC9944744&blobtype=pdf |
| ISSN | 00411337 |
| Journal | Transplantation |
| Volume Number | 107 |
| PubMed Central reference number | PMC9944744 |
| Issue Number | 3 |
| PubMed reference number | 36163639 |
| e-ISSN | 15346080 |
| DOI | 10.1097/tp.0000000000004307 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
| Publisher Date | 2022-09-27 |
| Publisher Place | Hagerstown, MD |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Rights License | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Transplantation |