Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.
| Content Provider | Europe PMC |
|---|---|
| Author | Hua, Juan Chen, Yang Yu, Jianhua Xiong, Qinmei Xia, Zhen Xia, Zirong Huang, Qianghui Kong, Qiling Chen, Huolong Zhang, Yichu Hu, Jianxin Li, Juxiang Hu, Jinzhu Chen, Qi Hong, Kui |
| Abstract | Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has developed in an effort to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between LBBAP and biventricular pacing (BIVP) in patients with heart failure (HF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Consecutive patients with HF and CLBBB requiring CRT received either LBBAP or BIVP were recruited at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from February 2018 to May 2019. We assessed their implant parameters, electrocardiogram (ECG), clinical outcomes at implant and during follow-up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Forty-one patients recruited including 21 for LBBAP and 20 for BIVP. Mean follow-up duration was 23.71 ± 4.44 months. LBBAP produced lower pacing thresholds, shorter procedure time and fluoroscopy duration compared to BIVP. The QRS duration was significantly narrower after LBBAP than BIVP (129.29 ± 31.46 vs. 156.85 ± 26.37 ms, p = 0.005). Notably, both LBBAP and BIVP significantly improved LVEF, LVEDD, NYHA class, and BNP compared with baseline. However, LBBAP significantly lowered BNP compared with BIVP (416.69 ± 411.39 vs. 96.07 ± 788.71 pg/ml, p = 0.007) from baseline to 24-month follow-up. Moreover, patients who received LBBAP exhibited lower number of hospitalizations than those in the BIVP group (p = 0.019). In addition, we found that patients with moderately prolonged left ventricular activation time (LVAT) and QRS notching in limb leads in baseline ECG respond better to LBBAP for CLBBB correction. LBBAP might be a relative safe and effective resynchronization therapy and as a supplement to BIVP for patients with HF and CLBBB. |
| Related Links | https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC9142423&blobtype=pdf |
| ISSN | 09108327 |
| Journal | Heart and Vessels [Heart Vessels] |
| Volume Number | 37 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00380-021-02016-5 |
| PubMed Central reference number | PMC9142423 |
| Issue Number | 7 |
| PubMed reference number | 35088204 |
| e-ISSN | 16152573 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Springer Japan |
| Publisher Date | 2022-01-28 |
| Publisher Place | Tokyo |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Rights License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. © The Author(s) 2022 |
| Subject Keyword | Left bundle branch area pacing Biventricular pacing Heart failure Complete left bundle branch block |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine |