Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
A comparison between four common ways of recording and storing speech: Implications for forensic phonetics
| Content Provider | CiteSeerX |
|---|---|
| Author | Livijn, Peder |
| Abstract | Forensic phoneticians often have to deal with suboptimal recordings. A lot of work has been done to find the identifying characteristics of speakers ’ voices. For this purpose, it is important to know the limits of the methods used. Media such as mobile phones or conventional tape recorders are often involved in forensic cases. This experiment aims at demonstrating the acoustic effects of channelling speech samples via such media. The results show that media such as micro cassettes and mobile phones are suboptimal from a forensic phonetic point of view. |
| File Format | |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Speech Sample Speaker Voice Acoustic Effect Suboptimal Recording Micro Cassette Forensic Phonetic Point Forensic Phonetician Conventional Tape Recorder Forensic Phonetics Forensic Case |
| Content Type | Text |
