Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
19 Evaluating Peripheral Displays
| Content Provider | CiteSeerX |
|---|---|
| Author | Matthews, Tara Hsieh, Gary Mankoff, Jennifer |
| Abstract | Abstract Although peripheral displays have been a domain of inquiry for over a decade now, evaluation criteria and techniques for this area are still being created. Peripheral display evaluation is an acknowledged challenge in a field setting.This article first describes models and methods that have been tailored specifically to evaluating peripheral displays (measuring how well they achieve their goals). Then, we present evaluation criteria used in past evaluations of peripheral dis-plays, ranging from issues such as learnability to distraction. After explaining how these criteria have been assessed in the past, we present a case study evaluation of two email peripheral displays that demonstrate the pros and cons of various evaluation techniques. Although peripheral displays have been a domain of inquiry for over a decade now (Gaver et al. 1991, Weiser and Brown 1996), evaluation criteria and tech-niques for this area are still being created. Peripheral display evaluation is an ac-knowledged challenge in a field setting (Carter et al. 2008, Mankoff et al. 2003). |
| File Format | |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Evaluation Criterion Peripheral Display Evaluating Peripheral Display Peripheral Display Evaluation Case Study Evaluation Field Setting Past Evaluation Describes Model Acknowledged Challenge Peripheral Dis-plays Ac-knowledged Challenge Email Peripheral Display Various Evaluation Technique |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
