Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Original paper methods for distance-based judgment aggregation.
| Content Provider | CiteSeerX |
|---|---|
| Abstract | Abstract Judgment aggregation theory, which concerns the translation of individual judgments on logical propositions into consistent group judgments, has shown that group consistency generally cannot be guaranteed if each proposition is treated independently from the others. Developing the right method of abandoning independence is thus a high-priority goal. However, little work has been done in this area outside of a few simple approaches. To fill the gap, we compare four methods based on distance metrics between judgment sets. The methods generalize the premise-based and sequential priority approaches to judgment aggregation, as well as distance-based preference aggregation. They each guarantee group consistency and implement a range of distinct functions with different properties, broadening the available tools for social choice. A central result is that only one of these methods (not previously considered in the literature) satisfies three attractive properties for all reasonable metrics. 1 |
| File Format | |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Distance-based Judgment Aggregation Original Paper Method Social Choice Guarantee Group Consistency Available Tool Right Method Distinct Function Individual Judgment Sequential Priority Approach Group Consistency Distance Metric Consistent Group Judgment Judgment Set Logical Proposition Attractive Property Central Result Different Property Little Work Abstract Judgment Aggregation Theory Distance-based Preference Aggregation Reasonable Metric High-priority Goal Simple Approach |
| Content Type | Text |
