Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Partial truth is not uncertaintv d fuzzy logic versus possibilistic logic.
| Content Provider | CiteSeerX |
|---|---|
| Author | Lhbois, Didier Prade, Hem-I. Toulouse, Sabatiw |
| Abstract | and cast serious doubts on the reasons for its success, arguing that “fuzzy logic collapses mathematically to two-valued logic. ” We completely disagree, and we especially object to two points: (1) Elkan’s proof uses too strong a notion of logical equivalence. The particular equivalence he considers, while valid in Boolean algebra, has nothing to do with fuzzy logic. (2) Elkan claims that De Morgan’s algebra “allows very little reasoning about collections of fuzzy assertions, ” although he correctly states that when logical equivalence is restricted to De |
| File Format | |
| Publisher Institution | Univenitk Paul Universitk Libre De Bmxelles |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Partial Truth Logical Equivalence Particular Equivalence Two-valued Logic De Morgan Fuzzy Assertion Elkan Proof Boolean Algebra Fuzzy Logic Collapse Elkan Claim Cast Serious Doubt Algebra Allows Fuzzy Logic |
| Content Type | Text |