Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Session strategies for promoting academic integrity in cs courses.
| Content Provider | CiteSeerX |
|---|---|
| Abstract | courses has become increasingly widespread. This paper describes the approach taken at Stanford University over the past ten years in an attempt to control this problem. Our approach consists of five steps. First, we have encouraged computer science faculty to become actively engaged in the university judicial process. Second, we have instituted the practice of using “expert witnesses ” who are familiar with programming assignments as part of the judicial process. Third, we have redefined the most common transgression—students who copy assignments from one another—as “plagiarism ” instead of “unpermitted collaboration. ” Fourth, we have adopted electronic tools to detect instances of plagiarism. Fifth, we have established consistent and explicit departmental policies about collaboration and plagiarism and made sure that those policies are well understood by students. By adopting this multifaceted approach, the computer science department at Stanford has been able to detect a larger fraction of the instances of academic dishonesty and prosecute more effectively the violations that occur. Index Terms ⎯ academic integrity, plagiarism. |
| File Format | |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Subject Keyword | Judicial Process Computer Science Department Expert Witness Stanford University Past Ten Year Explicit Departmental Policy Common Transgression Student Computer Science Faculty Academic Dishonesty Unpermitted Collaboration Electronic Tool Index Term Academic Integrity University Judicial Process |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
