Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Comparison of online greenhouse gas accounting tools for agriculture
| Content Provider | Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) |
|---|---|
| Author | MacSween, Kirsten Feliciano, Diana |
| Organization | CCAFS: PII-FP3_LEDPriorities |
| Organization | CCAFS: PII-FP3_SAMPLES |
| Organization | CCAFS: PII-FP3_USAIDLEDOpportunities |
| Description | Key messages ◼ Six online greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting tools were identified and analyzed to determine their advantages and disadvantages to how they estimate GHG emissions and emission reductions and provide context-relevant mitigation options with details regarding mitigation potential and potential trade-offs. ◼ The tools are the CCAFS Mitigation Options Tool (CCAFS-MOT), the Agriculture and Land Use Greenhouse Gas Inventory (ALU) Software, the Small-Holder Agriculture Monitoring and Baseline Assessment (SHAMBA), the EX-Ante Carbon-balance Tool (EX-ACT), the Cool Farm Tool (CFT), and the Carbon Benefits Project (CBP). ◼ This comparison aims to help potential users to better understand in which projects and activities the GHG accounting tools will be most relevant. ◼ Differential features include data required, emission factors used, whether mitigation options are identified, and usability at different geographic scales. |
| Related Links | https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/d0c40b67-fdb7-450d-abe3-e5f1ec96aa0b |
| File Format | |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security |
| Publisher Place | Wageningen, The Netherlands |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Rights License | CC-BY-NC-ND |
| Subject Keyword | Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Agriculture Climate Change Mitigation Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting Low Emissions Development |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Report |
| Subject | Agronomy and Crop Science Food Science Plant Science |