Loading...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Similar Documents
Designing for empowerment impact in agricultural development projects: Experimental evidence from the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh [Pub: 01-10-2021]
| Content Provider | Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) |
|---|---|
| Author | Quisumbing, Agnes R. Ahmed, Akhter Hoddinott, John F. Pereira, Audrey Roy, Shalini |
| Organization | IFPRI - Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) |
| Organization | IFPRI - Bangladesh Research and Strategy Support Program |
| Organization | IFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division |
| Organization | IFPRI - Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project (GAAP) |
| Spatial Coverage | Bangladesh [BD] |
| Description | The importance of women’s roles for nutrition-sensitive agricultural projects is increasingly recognized, yet little is known about whether such projects improve women’s empowerment and gender equality. We study the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) pilot project, which was implemented as a cluster-randomized controlled trial by the Government of Bangladesh. The project’s treatment arms included agricultural training, nutrition behavior change communication (BCC), and gender sensitization trainings delivered to husbands and wives together – with these components combined additively, such that the impact of gender sensitization could be distinguished from that of agriculture and nutrition trainings. Empowerment was measured using the internationally-validated project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI), and attitudes regarding gender roles were elicited from both men and women, to explore potentially gender-transformative impacts. Our study finds that ANGeL increased both women’s and men’s empowerment, raised the prevalence of households achieving gender parity, and led to small improvements in the gender attitudes of both women and men. We find significant increases in women’s empowerment scores and empowerment status from all treatment arms but with no significant differences across these. We find no evidence of unintended impacts on workloads and inconclusive evidence around impacts on intimate partner violence. Our results also suggest some potential benefits of bundling nutrition and gender components with an agricultural development intervention; however, many of these benefits seem to be driven by bundling nutrition with agriculture. While we cannot assess the extent to which including men and women within the same treatment arms contributed to our results, it is plausible that the positive impacts of all treatment arms on women’s empowerment outcomes may have arisen from implementation modalities that provided information to both husbands and wives when they were together. The role of engaging men and women jointly in interventions is a promising area for future research. |
| Sponsorship | United States Agency for International Development Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |
| Related Links | https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/9f62af41-c9df-4665-96de-cb726dddfd1d |
| File Format | |
| ISSN | 0305750X |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105622 |
| Journal | World Development |
| Issue Number | 21-Oct |
| Volume Number | 146 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Access Restriction | Open |
| Rights License | CC-BY-4.0 |
| Subject Keyword | Policies, Institutions, and Markets Agriculture for Nutrition and Health Gender Norms Projects Gender Women's Empowerment Nutrition-sensitive Agriculture Randomized Controlled Trials Empowerment Agriculture Nutrition Agricultural Development Women |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
| Subject | Agronomy and Crop Science Food Science Plant Science |
