NDLI: e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Ontological requirements for analogical, teleological, and hypothetical legal reasoning

A proposal for evidential reasoning about motives

Plausibility schemas: templates for legal factfinding

Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR

Evidence transmutations: gathering admissible evidence using belief revision

A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law

Abstract specification of legal contracts

NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation

Supporting of legal reasoning for cases which are not strictly regulated by law

NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics

Toward assessing law students' argument diagrams

Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus

How much logical structure is helpful in content-based argumentation software for legal case solving?

Formalising dynamic protocols for open agent systems

Analyzing a complaint database by means of a genetic-based data mining algorithm

Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claims

How to capture and use legal patterns in IT

Segmentation of legal documents

e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned

Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text

Legal metadata interchange framework to match CEN metalex

Why lawyers are nice (or nasty): a game-theoretical argumentation exercise

Law as a seamless web?: comparison of various network representations of the United States Supreme Court corpus (1791-2005)

Case law in extended argumentation frameworks

The network of French legal codes

Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief

Legal text analysis of the modification provisions: a pattern oriented approach

Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes

Using critical questions to disambiguate and formalize statutory provisions

Intelligent hybrid approach to false identity detection

Integrating induction and deduction for finding evidence of discrimination

Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entries

Incorporating issues of fairness into development of a multi-agent negotiation support system

Reasoning with spatial plans on the semantic web

Human-aided computer cognition for e-discovery

Toward a general theory of document modeling

e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned

Content Provider	ACM Digital Library
Author	van Engers, T. M. Hilhorst, Ir. R. A.
Abstract	Traditionally researchers in the AI&Law community conduct research after legal reasoning, legal knowledge representation and the application of AI-based techniques for supporting legal practitioners or their clients. The focus in AI&Law research, after focusing on legal knowledge based systems has shifted to legal argumentation, which as a topic is very appealing both from a knowledge representation perspective (especially if you have a background in logics) as from a knowledge engineering perspective. However while many researchers working in the field of AI&Law focus on legal argumentation only a few actually build argumentation support systems. Even fewer researchers actually conduct empirical research aimed at supporting lawyers and judges in practical situations. This is a pity since empirical research is a requisite for building systems that are to support lawyers and judges in their daily practice. Furthermore interesting developments are going on in different legal institutions, developments that bring the application of scientific results much closer. The current situation is that only a very small number of argumentation support systems exist, e.g. Auraucaria by Reed and Rowe [1] and Argumed by Verheij [2] and even these systems are not useable in practice. For AI & Law researchers it may be disappointing to experience that the systems that are actually used and considered to be useful are much less advanced compared to the dream ware in the researchers minds. The progress made in legal content management solutions is huge. Key to the success in this field is cooperation in the field of standardization, e.g. in the CEN/Metalex working group focusing on standards for legal sources. In the SEAL project [3] that was sponsored under the European eParticipation programme three different editors for legislation drafting were tested and a first attempt to come up with an open, integrated infrastructure for supporting the legislative chain has been made. Similar approaches have been developed in the judicial domain. Recent studies such as [4], [5] and [6] show that while the use of paper based dossiers is still the common practice within juridical environments some countries have made progress into changing to electronic dossiers and supporting the legal processes using case management and work flow management solutions. Despite the clear advantages that working with completely electronic dossiers has, as is demonstrated e.g. in the Austrian Ministry for Justice [5], many organizations haven't yet turned that into their daily practice yet. Changing dossiers containing paper documents to electronic dossiers containing electronic documents seems at first sight an easy job. But when the process around the handling of paper dossiers is studied carefully, and the types of documents involved, the transformation is not as easy as it seems. Also the traditional way of dealing a paper dossier is completely different from dealing with an electronic dossier. This makes that the acceptance of an electronic dossier by lawyers and judges is sometimes hard to get. In order to meet the requirements of the lawyers and judges, one important requirement is that an electronic dossier shouldn't involve more work than a paper-based dossier. This is one of the main requirements but not the only one. In this paper the development and implementation of electronic dossiers at the Dutch Council of State is described.
Starting Page	230
Ending Page	231
Page Count	2
File Format	PDF
ISBN	9781605585970
DOI	10.1145/1568234.1568268
Language	English
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Publisher Date	2009-06-08
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Subject Keyword	Computer-assisted legal drafting and document management
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

E-dossier at the dutch council of state: design, implementation and lessons learned.

Computer Based Training: Lessons Learned

Integrating Discourse and Domain Knowledge for Document Drafting (1999)

VMware distributed resource Management : design , Implementation , and lessons learned

SLIDES: Lessons Learned from the Development and Implementation of an Adaptive Management Plan at Three Hydropower Plants in Northeastern Washington State

Lessons learned from the design, implementation, and management of a smartphone-based crowdsourcing system

Lessons Learned in the Implementation of E-Teams*

Improving the Role of Experts under Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Lessons Learned from the Dutch Legal System

An ontological approach for Program Management Lessons Learned: Case study at Motorola Penang Design Centre

e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned

Similar Documents

E-dossier at the dutch council of state: design, implementation and lessons learned.

Computer Based Training: Lessons Learned

Integrating Discourse and Domain Knowledge for Document Drafting (1999)

VMware distributed resource Management : design , Implementation , and lessons learned

SLIDES: Lessons Learned from the Development and Implementation of an Adaptive Management Plan at Three Hydropower Plants in Northeastern Washington State

Lessons learned from the design, implementation, and management of a smartphone-based crowdsourcing system

Lessons Learned in the Implementation of E-Teams*

Improving the Role of Experts under Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law: Lessons Learned from the Dutch Legal System

An ontological approach for Program Management Lessons Learned: Case study at Motorola Penang Design Centre

e-dossier at the Dutch Council of State: design, implementation and lessons learned