Please wait, while we are loading the content...
Please wait, while we are loading the content...
| Content Provider | ACM Digital Library |
|---|---|
| Author | Dinsmore, John Thakur, Madhukar N. |
| Abstract | Our approach to the representation of time is based on Dinsmore's theory of knowledge partitioning which factors any piece of knowledge into two components, a context and a description and accordingly distributes the knowledge over multiple knowledge bases called spaces each characterized by its context. Each space is a domain for localized reasoning processes and its context bears strict relationship to other spaces. Since a space is characterized by its context, the legal consistency of a space is a property of its context. Thus we define legal contexts as follows: If f is a propositional function that maps a proposition P into a proposition f(P), we can use f as a legal context if and only if it is entailment preserving i.e., (for all P, Q) f(P & (P—> Q)) —> f(Q). If C is the context of a space s1 with respect to another space s2 then a proposition P true in s1 is equivalent to the proposition C(P) true in s2. This process called context climbing helps retrieve knowledge from one space into another. (Contexts may be temporal or otherwise e.g. “George believes___”, “In 1985___”, “If P then___”, “During the past hour,___” are some legal contexts.) Descriptions having the same context with respect to a space may be stored in the same space. The creation of a unique space with a context C is possible only if the context can be distributed over conjunction, i.e., (for all P, Q) (C(P) & C(Q) —> C(P&Q)). If C is a distributive context then propositions P and Q are stored as P, Q in the unique space referred to by C.The idea of temporal spaces (those defined by temporal contexts) is more general than that of history proposed by Hayes. A temporal space contains propositions true at the corresponding time irrespective of their spatial dimensions. Temporal contexts are more general than the tense operators invented by Prior that map propositions true in the past or future into the present. This is because the knowledge partitioning scheme is not restricted to the four tense operators as contexts but allows any entailment preserving propositional function as a context of a temporal space. This scheme is more advantageous than a system which does not make the structural distinction between contexts and descriptions, for instance Allen's system, because such a system does not consolidate information into units that model possible situations. The proposed representation makes no logical distinction between contexts referring to time instants or intervals. One can reason about each space in isolation and use context climbing to transfer the results of the reasoning process and other information to other spaces. The set of 13 mutually exclusive and exhaustive temporal relations formulated by Allen could serve as some of the temporal contexts, since a temporal context specifies the relation of propositions in a space to those in another space. In this sense, then successive context climbing between spaces is analogous to the transitivity of temporal relations given by Allen. Contexts generalize the idea of temporal relations, as they map a proposition into a world existing at a particular time. This scheme avoids combinatorial problems by focussing reasoning processes on restricted domains and by allowing complex temporal inferences in relatively few steps. It allows one to reason about temporal and atemporal knowledge in an integrated framework. This mode of representation removes a great deal of redundancy in both storage and processing since the common context of all descriptions in a space is stored only once and does not take part in local reasoning in the space. |
| File Format | |
| ISBN | 0897912187 |
| DOI | 10.1145/322917.323075 |
| Language | English |
| Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) |
| Publisher Date | 1987-02-01 |
| Publisher Place | New York |
| Access Restriction | Subscribed |
| Content Type | Text |
| Resource Type | Article |
National Digital Library of India (NDLI) is a virtual repository of learning resources which is not just a repository with search/browse facilities but provides a host of services for the learner community. It is sponsored and mentored by Ministry of Education, Government of India, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT). Filtered and federated searching is employed to facilitate focused searching so that learners can find the right resource with least effort and in minimum time. NDLI provides user group-specific services such as Examination Preparatory for School and College students and job aspirants. Services for Researchers and general learners are also provided. NDLI is designed to hold content of any language and provides interface support for 10 most widely used Indian languages. It is built to provide support for all academic levels including researchers and life-long learners, all disciplines, all popular forms of access devices and differently-abled learners. It is designed to enable people to learn and prepare from best practices from all over the world and to facilitate researchers to perform inter-linked exploration from multiple sources. It is developed, operated and maintained from Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
Learn more about this project from here.
NDLI is a conglomeration of freely available or institutionally contributed or donated or publisher managed contents. Almost all these contents are hosted and accessed from respective sources. The responsibility for authenticity, relevance, completeness, accuracy, reliability and suitability of these contents rests with the respective organization and NDLI has no responsibility or liability for these. Every effort is made to keep the NDLI portal up and running smoothly unless there are some unavoidable technical issues.
Ministry of Education, through its National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (NMEICT), has sponsored and funded the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) project.
| Sl. | Authority | Responsibilities | Communication Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education |
Sanctioning Authority | https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives |
| 2 | Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project | https://www.iitkgp.ac.in |
| 3 | National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur | The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project | Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in |
| 4 | Project PI / Joint PI | Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project |
Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon |
| 5 | Website/Portal (Helpdesk) | Queries regarding NDLI and its services | support@ndl.gov.in |
| 6 | Contents and Copyright Issues | Queries related to content curation and copyright issues | content@ndl.gov.in |
| 7 | National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club) | Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach | clubsupport@ndl.gov.in |
| 8 | Digital Preservation Centre (DPC) | Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books | dpc@ndl.gov.in |
| 9 | IDR Setup or Support | Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops | idr@ndl.gov.in |
|
Loading...
|