NDLI: Unlocking learners' evaluative skills: a peer review perspective

Please wait, while we are loading the content...

Unlocking learners' evaluative skills: a peer review perspective

Eye tracking in computing education

A systematic review of approaches for teaching introductory programming and their influence on success

The recurring rainfall problem

A structured approach to teaching recursion using cargo-bot

Diversifying high school students' views about computing with electronic textiles

Graduating students' designs: through a phenomenographic lens

Academic integrity perceptions regarding computing assessments and essays

Measuring enrichment: the assembly and validation of an instrument to assess student self-beliefs in CS1

Self-explaining from video recordings as a methodology for learning programming

In-flow peer-review of tests in test-first programming

Theoretical underpinnings of computing education research: what is the evidence?

Investigating novice programming mistakes: educator beliefs vs. student data

Exploring variation in students' correct traces of linear recursion

New enactments of mentoring and activism: U.S. women of color in computing education and careers

Computer programs, dialogicality, and intentionality

How CS undergraduates make course choices

Measuring cognitive load in introductory CS: adaptation of an instrument

Identification and measurement of computer science competencies in the area of software development, software engineering and programming

Predicting student success using fine grain clicker data

CS outreach to high school enrollment: bridging the gap

Adaptive parsons problems with discourse rules

Big data and data management: a topic for secondary computing education

Allegories for learning abstract programming concepts

Computational thinking curriculum development for upper elementary school classes

The effect of robotics activities on students' learning and attitudes

Cartographies of practice

Using case-based reasoning to improve the quality of feedback generated by automated grading systems

Promoting constructive mindsets for overcoming failure in computer science education

What pedagogical content knowledge competencies do computer science pre-service teachers have?

Developing students' problem-posing skills

User groups: community collaborative learning

Evaluating diversity initiatives in computer science: do they have unintended side-effects?

Physical computing in computer science education

User models of reasoning and understanding in app inventor

How can we improve notational expertise?

Unlocking learners' evaluative skills: a peer review perspective

Content Provider	ACM Digital Library
Author	Nicol, David J.
Abstract	The recent literature on assessment and feedback in higher education emphasises the need to develop students' self-regulatory abilities. Students must be equipped with the skills to think for themselves, to set their own goals, to monitor and evaluate their own work in relation to these goals. They must also be able to carry out such regulatory activities in collaboration with others, for example, where performance goals and tasks are shared. A pivotal construct underpinning the idea of self-regulation and co-regulation is that of evaluative judgement. The capacity to regulate their own learning fundamentally depends on students having the ability to make valid and informative judgements about the quality of academic work as it is being produced. This capacity cannot be acquired through evaluative practices that are solely carried out and controlled by the teacher or where the primary conception of feedback is that of teacher transmission. In this keynote it will be argued that peer review is the most productive platform for the development of evaluative judgement and self-regulatory skills. Peer review is defined as an arrangement whereby students produce a written assignment and then review and write comments on assignments produced by peers in the same topic domain. The presentation will synthesise recent research and provide a set of research-based guiding principles for the design of peer review.
Starting Page	1
Ending Page	2
Page Count	2
File Format	PDF
ISBN	9781450327558
DOI	10.1145/2632320.2632359
Language	English
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Publisher Date	2014-07-28
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	Subscribed
Subject Keyword	Evaluative judgement Feedback Peer review Self-regulation
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement

From a Thousand Learners to a Thousand Markers: Scaling Peer Feedback with Adaptive Comparative Judgement

Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work

Work in progress - peer review from a student perspective

Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English

The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education

to Peer Review : Professional Development to Improve Feedback Skills and Self-Efficacy

Developing Student Mentor self-regulation skills through formative feedback: Rubric development phase

Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards

Unlocking learners' evaluative skills: a peer review perspective

Similar Documents

Developing student competence through peer assessment: the role of feedback, self-regulation and evaluative judgement

From a Thousand Learners to a Thousand Markers: Scaling Peer Feedback with Adaptive Comparative Judgement

Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work

Work in progress - peer review from a student perspective

Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English

The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education

to Peer Review : Professional Development to Improve Feedback Skills and Self-Efficacy

Developing Student Mentor self-regulation skills through formative feedback: Rubric development phase

Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards

Unlocking learners' evaluative skills: a peer review perspective