NDLI: Lightweight preliminary peer review:does in-class peer review make sense?

Content Provider	ACM Digital Library
Author	Kelly, Michael Malani, Roshni Simon, Beth Denning, Tamara Lindquist, David Griswold, William G.
Abstract	Peer review is widely recognized for advancing student learning, in particular for developing reflective processes like critical thinking. The classroom is ripe for peer review because the subject matter is fresh and in-depth interactivity is possible. Yet the limited time available in class conflicts with peer review's deliberative nature. We hypothesize that peer review -- at least the initial stages of it -- can be supported in the classroom with tools for facilitating the rapid identification of interesting issues for discussion. The potential benefits of such a tool include: furthering the student-focus of in-class active learning activities, further implanting critical analysis skills through frequent in-class use, supporting immediate feedback, and enabling comparison of student and instructor-modeled critical analysis.This paper explores tool support for in-class lightweight preliminary peer-review (LPPR): peer review that is instigated in the classroom, but does not necessarily end there. We proposed that students classify peer solutions in 4 dimensions: correctness, comprehension (e.g., "do I understand this solution"), worthiness for discussion, and similarity to the evaluator's own solution. We designed an LPPR extension to Ubiquitous Presenter, and then conducted an exploratory study in a mock classroom setting. We found that LPPR can quickly identify a subset of student solutions that warrant immediate discussion, and that modest amounts of reflection arise from the LPPR process.
Starting Page	266
Ending Page	270
Page Count	5
File Format	PDF
ISSN	00978418
DOI	10.1145/1227504.1227406
Journal	ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (SGCS)
Volume Number	39
Issue Number	1
Language	English
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Publisher Date	1978-02-01
Publisher Place	New York
Access Restriction	One Nation One Subscription (ONOS)
Subject Keyword	Active learning Educational technology Peer review
Content Type	Text
Resource Type	Article

Sl.	Authority	Responsibilities	Communication Details
1	Ministry of Education (GoI), Department of Higher Education	Sanctioning Authority	https://www.education.gov.in/ict-initiatives
2	Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	Host Institute of the Project: The host institute of the project is responsible for providing infrastructure support and hosting the project	https://www.iitkgp.ac.in
3	National Digital Library of India Office, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur	The administrative and infrastructural headquarters of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in
4	Project PI / Joint PI	Principal Investigator and Joint Principal Investigators of the project	Dr. B. Sutradhar bsutra@ndl.gov.in Prof. Saswat Chakrabarti will be added soon
5	Website/Portal (Helpdesk)	Queries regarding NDLI and its services	support@ndl.gov.in
6	Contents and Copyright Issues	Queries related to content curation and copyright issues	content@ndl.gov.in
7	National Digital Library of India Club (NDLI Club)	Queries related to NDLI Club formation, support, user awareness program, seminar/symposium, collaboration, social media, promotion, and outreach	clubsupport@ndl.gov.in
8	Digital Preservation Centre (DPC)	Assistance with digitizing and archiving copyright-free printed books	dpc@ndl.gov.in
9	IDR Setup or Support	Queries related to establishment and support of Institutional Digital Repository (IDR) and IDR workshops	idr@ndl.gov.in

Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?

Lightweight Preliminary Peer Review: Does In-Class Peer Review Make Sense?

Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense

Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports

Adult Learning and Technology in Working-Class Life

Student-generated active-learning exercises

Learning to make meaning without making “sense” : New Media for Juxtaposing Words to Create Imagery

Peer reviewers learn from giving comments

Making sense of technology in educational leadership programs

Lightweight preliminary peer review:does in-class peer review make sense?

Similar Documents

Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense?

Lightweight Preliminary Peer Review: Does In-Class Peer Review Make Sense?

Lightweight preliminary peer review: does in-class peer review make sense

Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports

Adult Learning and Technology in Working-Class Life

Student-generated active-learning exercises

Learning to make meaning without making “sense” : New Media for Juxtaposing Words to Create Imagery

Peer reviewers learn from giving comments

Making sense of technology in educational leadership programs

Lightweight preliminary peer review:does in-class peer review make sense?